Page 1 of 1


Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2018 11:42 am
by k.d.
At least one person in MSM is making sense ... 0niyl-vDBk

Re: Tucker

Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2018 12:26 pm
by j.p.
At the very end the Senator finally admitted that it was "strategic interests" that would compel us to attack Assad. "Strategic interests" is code for oil and Isreali cash.

I would say it probably was Assad/Iran with Russia's blessing that did poison Syrian citizens. They would have the most to gain and the least to lose by doing so. Any military response by the US would simply be for bloodlust. It would do nothing to alter Assad's behavior.

A son of a very good friend has been on standby to deploy to Syria. He is waiting on political whims.

Re: Tucker

Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2018 12:50 pm
by k.d.
Sure, and the Skripals were poisoned!!! How can you fall for this nonsense?
Please watch the Ron Paul report I just posted. There was no gas attack in Syria.